M&S Cyberattack: £136 Million Price Tag as Profits Collapse 55%

November 6, 2025

Marks & Spencer has revealed the full financial impact of its April 2025 cyberattack, with total costs reaching £136 million and profits plummeting by more than half. The incident demonstrates how a single cyber breach can devastate even large retailers' financial performance and operational capabilities.

The Financial Damage

In its half-year results for the six months ended 27th September, M&S disclosed £101.6 million in charges already incurred, with another £34 million expected in the second half of the financial year. The breakdown shows £83 million spent on immediate systems response and recovery, with remaining expenses covering legal and professional services.


The retailer will offset some costs through its cyber insurance policy, claiming the maximum £100 million coverage. However, this still leaves M&S bearing £36 million in unrecovered costs—and that's assuming the insurance claim is paid in full without dispute.


Profits fell dramatically by 55.4% year-on-year to £184.1 million. Whilst the cyberattack bore primary responsibility for this collapse, a new packaging disposal levy added over £50 million in additional costs, compounding the financial pressure.


The attack's impact appears less severe than initially feared. M&S had warned in May that costs could reach £300 million by year-end, suggesting the company's recovery efforts proved more effective than worst-case scenarios anticipated.



Operational Disruption

Despite technical difficulties, revenues actually rose 22.1% to £7.96 billion—testament to M&S's brand strength and the effectiveness of manual workarounds implemented during the crisis. However, this revenue growth masks significant operational struggles across different business units.


Sales in fashion, home, and beauty departments declined 16.4% during the reporting period, driven largely by the complete halt in online orders spanning April to June. Online services returned gradually over following weeks, but recovery remained incomplete throughout the reporting period.


Food sales increased 7.8%, yet profits in this division collapsed 58.8%. Manual processes for allocating food items to stores resulted in increased markdown and waste. Store sales fell 3.4% partly due to reduced product availability. UK online sales plummeted 42.9%.



The Response Strategy

One of M&S's earliest incident response actions involved disconnecting warehouse management systems. This decision, whilst protecting systems from further compromise, meant online and in-store orders faced immediate adverse impact.


The retailer implemented manual processes to maintain business continuity. These workarounds kept stores operational but dramatically increased stock management costs. Operating profit margin collapsed from 12% to just 2.7%—a staggering decline showing how cyber incidents affect operational efficiency even after systems are restored.


The manual processes proved particularly problematic for food operations, where timing and stock rotation are critical. Increased waste and markdown from less efficient allocation methods severely impacted profitability despite maintaining sales volumes.



Broader Implications

M&S's experience illustrates several critical realities about cyberattacks on retail operations. First, cyber insurance provides important financial protection but rarely covers full costs. The £36 million gap between total costs and insurance coverage represents real money the business must absorb.


Second, immediate technical costs represent only part of the picture. Legal fees, professional services, operational inefficiencies, and lost sales compound the damage. M&S's operating margin collapse from 12% to 2.7% shows how cyber incidents undermine profitability even after technical systems are restored.

Third, recovery takes months, not weeks. Online orders halted in April didn't fully recover during the reporting period ending September. Business disruption extends far beyond initial incident response.


Fourth, even with manual workarounds maintaining operations, efficiency losses prove enormously expensive. The food division's 58.8% profit decline despite 7.8% sales growth demonstrates how manual processes destroy margins.



Looking Forward

CEO Stuart Machin described the first half as "an extraordinary moment in time" for M&S, stating the company is "now getting back on track." The full recovery timeline remains unclear, as does whether operating margins will return to pre-attack levels.


For retailers and other organisations, M&S's experience provides a stark case study in cyber incident costs. The £136 million price tag, 55% profit decline, and months-long operational disruption underscore why cybersecurity investment matters—and why incident response planning must account for prolonged business impact, not just technical recovery.



Protect Your Business from Cyber Threats

At Altiatech, we help organisations implement comprehensive cybersecurity strategies that prevent attacks and minimise impact when incidents occur. Our services include security assessments, incident response planning, and ongoing threat monitoring to protect your operations and financial performance.


Get in touch:

📧 Email: innovate@altiatech.com
📞 Phone (UK): +44 (0)330 332 5482

Prevent attacks. Protect profits. Maintain operations.

Ready to move from ideas to delivery?


Whether you’re planning a cloud change, security uplift, cost governance initiative or a digital delivery programme, we can help you shape the scope and the right route to market.


Email:
innovate@altiatech.com or call 0330 332 5842 (Mon–Fri, 9am–5:30pm).


Main contact page: https://www.altiatech.com/contact

Hand holding a phone displaying the Microsoft Copilot logo with the Microsoft logo blurred in the background.
By Simon Poole February 18, 2026
A practical governance checklist for Microsoft Copilot in 2026, using the Copilot Control System to manage risk, security, compliance, and oversight.
Route to market diagram: Bank to delivery platform, with steps like product mgmt and customer support.
By Simon Poole February 12, 2026
Explains what the Technology Services 4 (TS4) framework means for public sector buyers and how to procure Altiatech services through compliant routes.
Two people shaking hands between cloud data and data analytics dashboards.
By Simon Poole February 10, 2026
Explores where IT waste really comes from and how FinOps helps organisations regain control of cloud spend, improve efficiency, and turn cost visibility into advantage.
People discussing data and cloud infrastructure, near a government building.
By Simon Poole February 9, 2026
An overview of CCS Digital Outcomes 7 explaining Altiatech’s routes to market and how public sector organisations can procure services.
January 26, 2026
Cyberattacks, system failures, natural disasters, and human errors will occur—the question isn't if but when. Cyber resilience planning ensures organisations can withstand incidents, maintain critical operations during disruptions, and recover quickly when systems fail. It's not just about preventing attacks; it's about ensuring business continuity regardless of what goes wrong.
January 19, 2026
Manual user provisioning - the process of creating accounts and granting access through email requests and IT tickets - seems manageable for small organisations. As organisations grow, this approach creates mounting security risks, operational inefficiencies, and frustrated users waiting days for access they need immediately.
January 12, 2026
Multi-cloud strategies deliver flexibility, redundancy, and the ability to select the best platform for each workload. They also create complex security challenges, particularly around identity and access management. Each cloud provider offers different security models, tools, and terminology, making unified security difficult to achieve.
January 5, 2026
Privileged accounts—those with administrative rights to critical systems—represent the most attractive target for attackers. A single compromised privileged credential gives attackers complete control over infrastructure, data, and operations. Yet many organisations manage privileged access inadequately, creating unnecessary risk.
December 22, 2025
Identity and access management represents a critical security capability, yet many organisations struggle to assess whether their IAM implementation is truly effective. Identity governance maturity models provide a framework for evaluation, revealing gaps and priorities for improvement.
December 15, 2025
Traditional security models assumed everything inside the corporate network was trustworthy, focusing defensive efforts on the perimeter. This approach fails catastrophically in today's hybrid work environment where employees access resources from homes, coffee shops, and co-working spaces whilst applications reside across multiple clouds.